🔗 Share this article

Over an extended period, intimidating phone calls persisted. Originally, supposedly from a former police officer and a former defense officer, and then from the authorities. Finally, a local artisan claims he was called to the police station and told clearly: remain silent or experience severe repercussions.

This third-generation resident is one of many resisting a multimillion-dollar redevelopment plan where this historic settlement – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – will be bulldozed and transformed by a multinational conglomerate.

"The distinctive community of this area is unparalleled in the globe," states the protester. "Yet the plan aims to eradicate our way of life and prevent our protests."

Contrasting Realities

The cramped lanes of this community sit in stark contrast to the high-rise structures and Bollywood penthouses that dominate the settlement. Residences are built haphazardly and often lacking adequate facilities, informal businesses release harmful emissions and the environment is permeated by the overpowering odor of open sewers.

Among some individuals, the prospect of Dharavi transformed into a developed area of luxury high-rises, neat parks, modern retail complexes and homes with proper sanitation is a hopeful vision realized.

"There's no adequate medical facilities, paved pathways or sewage systems and we have no places for kids to enjoy," explains a chai seller, in his fifties, who moved from his home state in 1982. "The only way is to demolish everything and construct proper housing."

Community Resistance

However, some, like the leather artisan, are fighting against the plan.

Everyone acknowledges that the slum, long neglected as an illegal encroachment, is desperately requiring financial support and improvement. Yet they worry that this initiative – absent of public consultation – could potentially transform premium city property into a luxury development, forcing out the marginalized, working-class residents who have resided there since generations ago.

These were these excluded, migrant workers who built up the uninhabited area into a frequently examined example of self-reliance and economic productivity, whose economic value is worth between one million dollars and a substantial sum a year, making it among the globe's biggest informal economies.

Resettlement Issues

Of the roughly one million people living in the packed sprawling area, a minority will be qualified for alternative accommodation in the project, which is projected to take seven years to complete. The remainder will be transferred to barren areas and saline fields on the remote edges of the metropolis, threatening to fragment a historic social network. Some will receive no residences at all.

Residents permitted to stay in the area will be allocated apartments in multi-story structures, a significant rupture from the organic, communal way of dwelling and laboring that has maintained the community for many years.

Businesses from garment work to ceramic crafts and waste processing are expected to reduce in scale and be moved to a specific "business area" distant from residential areas.

Existential Threat

For those such as the leather artisan, a workshop owner and multi-generational inhabitant to reside in the slum, the redevelopment presents a fundamental risk. His rickety, multi-level facility makes leather coats – tailored coats, premium outerwear, studded bomber jackets – sold in premium stores in upscale neighborhoods and internationally.

Household members dwells in the accommodations underneath and his workers and tailors – workers from different regions – also sleep there, permitting him to afford their labour. Outside Dharavi's enclave, accommodation prices are frequently tenfold as high for minimal space.

Pressure and Coercion

In the government offices nearby, an illustrated mock-up of the redevelopment plan shows a contrasting outlook. Well-groomed residents move around on bicycles and eco-friendly transport, buying international baguettes and breakfast items and having coffee on a terrace outside a coffee shop and treat station. It is a stark contrast from the affordable idli sambar breakfast and low-cost tea that maintains local residents.

"This isn't improvement for us," says the protester. "This constitutes a huge real estate deal that will price people out for us to survive."

Additionally, there exists concern of the development company. Managed by an influential industrialist – a leading figure and a supporter of the national leader – the corporation has faced accusations of favoritism and financial impropriety, which it disputes.

Even as the state government labels it a joint project, the business group contributed a significant amount for its controlling interest. Legal proceedings stating that the project was unfairly awarded to the developer is under review in India's supreme court.

Ongoing Pressure

After they started to publicly resist the project, Shaikh and other residents assert they have been experienced a long-running campaign of coercion and warning – including communications, explicit warnings and implications that criticizing the development was tantamount to anti-national sentiment – by people they assert are associated with the corporate group.

Part of the group alleged to have issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c