🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters originating from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials demands measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The company is attempting modifications of a pending law that include lowering the proposed size of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“As an elected official, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year succumb to smoking-associated diseases, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to several government departments and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with health policies. Last month, WHO officials raised concerns that the cigarette manufacturers was escalating campaigns to weaken global control measures.

“Evidence exists of industry lobbying globally. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN summit conference,” stated the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and mandating that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Through correspondence, the company recommends this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “following international guideline limits”, deferred for no less than 12 months after the bill passes.

Global health authorities specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least half of the cigarette package face “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. It suggests prohibiting a smaller list of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for multiple violations “ranging from a percentage of annual turnover to ten-year jail sentences”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia says the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but claims that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The advocate stated BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that many such provisions were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “complete contradiction”, he commented.

“We live in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my back yard and harvest that and market the products – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to benefit personally and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are perishing … is in itself absolute spiritual collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the Britain or other nations had not caused companies to close, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Formal company response

A BAT Zambia spokesperson said: “The company operates its operations according with current country statutes. Moreover, the company participates in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which provide for interested party involvement in policymaking.”

The corporation remained “not resisting legislation”, they said, noting that young individuals should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion developing rules to achieve intended public health goals, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the representative explained, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which encompasses rising levels of illicit trade”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.